Overall, it's a level headed and fact-based opinion. I have seen social scientists struggle to offer a cultural explanation, but I havent heard any such hypothesis that is the least bit credible, and have been unable to formulate one myself. If women do not try to negotiate for better pay aggressively, and are therefore not getting the pay they deserve then a gender pay gap exists. Basically if you change the name on the application form you change the outcome.. However, the differences that do exist are large enough so that they play an importance role in determining or at least affecting important life outcomes, such as occupational choice. Absolutely, and Peterson says as much himself, that there are more in group differences than there are differences between groups. https://goo.gl/3t4SHw https://lnkd.in/dShtnhj it's not exactly a debate but absolutely worth watching #debateskills I found a contradiction in this article when it was stated in order to achieve equality, its necessary to be unfair. Another myth says the gender pay gap is inevitable as women choose lower-paid jobs because of fixed biological traits. Photograph: Channel 4. Testing without a commitment to follow-up support for individuals is another serious issue to be dealt with. So one way of looking at it may be that given most of the predictors of success in business or politics are traditionally seen as male, then if a woman is simply allowed to be female (by regulating behavior in the workplace, having quotas for women on BODs, or allowing for generous paid leave for family rearing), women MAY be MORE LIKELY to disengage from these pursuits, and more likely to raise a family or take on part time jobs, or low paying jobs with flexible schedules. The latter happens to be my field, in addition to clinical psychology. Women in STEM are paid 20% less than their male colleagues annually, according to a 2018 survey by the New Scientist. Peterson mentioned women choose lower paying careers, but gaps still exists within most industries, including 66% lower earnings for female financial specialists, and 71% smaller incomes for female doctors (when age, education, race and hours were controlled). That is not the case for men. | jordan peterson t.co 3ydqbsuaeh". Her fifth book, The Alpha Females Guide to Men & Marriage: HOW LOVE WORKS, was published in February 2017. We are unequivocal in our belief that diversity and inclusion are critical to our success as a company.. Peterson may have reservations about one method the IAT but that doesnt mean bias doesnt exist. This shows that its not just agreeableness but also shyness that may be playing a role in the gender pay gap. But if you walked into a roomful of people everyone of whom had been selected to be the most aggressive person out of a 100 almost every one of them would be male. All of these traits in your [Damores] manifesto described as female are the core traits that make someone successful at engineering. . https://www.scribd.com/document/355823379/Google-s-Ideological-Echo-Chamber. Zunger adds: Engineering is all about cooperation, collaboration and empathy for colleagues and customers. Source: www.youtube.com Allegations and resignations shine unwelcome light on RAF Transport sector recruitment should be overhauled to improve Im not an activist: I just want fairer Driving performance and capability through L&D. Many might think hes being horrible and unfair, but perhaps hes just spotted a chink in HRs armour Rob Briner. This is one of the reasons why large corporations now talk about the need for fairness. He discusses the pay gap, patriarchy and his new book " 12 Rules for Life ." Subscribe: http://bit.ly/2mFYm8e. If anything makes for a hostile workplace in business and universities it is the Mass acceptance of pornography. But are Petersons criticisms really just skating across the surface, failing to take account of the true nature and potential of such work? But cooperation is not the core of engineering. If you want to see this in real time check out the comments to nearly everything the progressives of the worlds darling, @Justin Trudeau tweets, even on the very few occasions when he doesnt reference some variation on gender/identity/grievance politics. Cathy Newman interviews Jordan Peterson on Channel 4 News video, science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) workforce, Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC). Now it may seem small but the main thrust of Jordans argument is that part of what can explain the pay gap is that women are just high enough on agreeableness so that makes them less likely to negotiate agressively for higher pay. However, thats not exactly what he said and, as he never tires of telling us, hes very (x3) careful with his words. Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning, Three gender pay gap myths debunked video explainer. The only thing that needs more emphasis by Peterson and others is the destructive power of three generations of pornography. This seems to be the most likely to generate the desired gender ratios, but at some point one would wonder whether there is some core function of engineering that is being neglected in pursuit of being diverse. He says:The best solutions recognise that it is not a one-off fix but a constant battle against our unconscious brains ongoing tendencies to stereotype. The median gap is calculated by lining up all mens and womens wages from top to bottom, and comparing the number that falls in the middle for each gender. It is very much *not* about people. According to ONS data from 2015, women still perform the bulk of unpaid domestic work, including childcare, laundry and housework. If I did not have children, I would be at my office from 8 a.m.-5 p.m. every day, thus mirroring John's life. You have been found out. To take up Petersons example, its true that engineering is dominated by men. Over the last few weeks, I have been in Oslo, twice; Helsinki, twice; Stockholm, twice; and Copenhagen, once. These different choices men and women make are at the heart of the debate over the gender pay gap. listeners: [], J. Andrew Dykens. In the last lecture, in Helsinki, it was Finlands Fathers Day, so I talked about masculine virtue. Give up! What about men who want a better work/life balance, of whom there are millions? Well attempt to unpack his arguments about the gender pay gap, and the literature surrounding the gender pay gap all while attempting to keep a certain level of objectivity. About us I must unhappily admit that a great many contemporary feminists are made of straw I was interviewed by the Diversity Officer (woman) who asked how I would work in what had been an all women team of 10. When jordan peterson debated matt dillahunty, what unfolded was a fascinating discussion about morality. There are other sex differences, as well, but they arent as large, excepting that of the aforementioned interest: men are comparatively more interested in things and women in people. window.mc4wp = window.mc4wp || { Why should we launch large-scale experiments aimed at transforming the socialization of children, when we have no idea what the outcome might be? HR practitioners should listen to his arguments and be prepared to defend their corner with the best evidence they can find to support the view that fairer recruitment policies make business sense and benefit us all. Article 106849 . Privacy policy Satya said: If anything, to me it is a very good example of why arguments about the UK wage gap will not be solved with "feelings," which is her argument. This is what will help edge Western Culture back toward sanity when the Diversity Industry starts to lose lawsuits like Damores lawsuit against Google, and the 2nd lawsuit at Youtube (for avoiding while/male applicants) and those losses hit the bottom line in a real way shareholders and other ADULTS will take control back from the children and their insane demands. Peterson says that men and women are more similar than they are different, something strangely omitted in the above article. They are radically over-represented among those who view my YouTube lectures. Peterson responds: Its distressing to hear that theres an acceptance of the idea that diversity can be mapped onto race and gender, especially with regard to performance there is no evidence of that [improved performance] whatsoever.. The reason that you cant see it in an article is that its complicated, and way more complicated than anyone is really able to boil down. Saw half my companys HR staff sacked after a consultancy reviewed their policies and procedures. It was never my intention to make the professor out to be a monster; in fact I go out of my way to state that the HR sector needs to hear his arguments and that he is not a politically motivated monster. Essentially he is saying that if you took the average amount made by men and compared it to women, there would be a difference. Its 20 to one female nurses to male and approximately the same male engineers to female engineers, he explains. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an influx of misinformation surrounding the virus and its origins. However that doesnt mean that the pay gap exists because of gender. It would be a mistake to dismiss the forthright Torontouniversity psychology professor as an alt-right blowhard; he is a fluent advocate for his views and uses research as evidence. The better solution is to not use science at all. The term "cultural marxism" moved into the media mainstream around 2016, when psychologist jordan peterson was protesting a canadian bill prohibiting discrimination based on gender. Hmm, the deafening silence . But the results of the IAT have not been shown to predict behavior. You dont fight racism (discimination/bigotry/sexism et al) with more racism (et al). The most extreme myth is that gender pay gap is a lie perpetuated by feminists who use statistics dishonestly to further their cause. Cookies policy PART 1: SCANDINAVIA. People who describe themselves as kind tend not to consider themselves competitive, for example, but are likely to accept cooperative and caring. Likewise, creative types might regard themselves as curious and inventive, while the diligent types are also dutiful and orderly. A trait-like phenomenon was also identified: that of interest interest in people vs. things. https://gynocentrism.com/2018/03/03/jordan-peterson-on-psychological-differences-similarities-between-the-sexes/. These two glaring omissions that the pay gap is between mothers and fathers rather than between women and men, and that the reason it exists is due to the different choices men and women make regarding work and family make the "60 Minutes" program a complete sham. The wage gap perception is a manifestation of hard-wired male/female differences and society would suffer in the long run if we mind-control people into believing those differences dont exist. Engineering is all about cooperation, collaboration and empathy for colleagues and customers. You have a better chance without the IAT, because its probably junk. Ive worked as a software programmer for the last 10 years. I dont think its about disproving claims but more about presenting how many different factors there are in all this. Thats a consequence of the free choice of men and women in the societies that have gone farther than any other societies to make gender equality the purpose of the law. And there is a major but. In January, Peterson discussed the gender pay gap with Channel 4 News Cathy Newman, an interview that has been watched more than seven million times online. Engineers, for example, tend to be those who are not only interested in things, but who are more interested in things than most people, men or women. Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism. Would the differences between men and women be larger or smaller in wealthier countries? Dr. Jordan Peterson 2019-02-26T12:03:23-05:00 I came across Dr. Warren Farrell's work a few years ago, when I read Why Men Earn More( https://amzn.to/2HX3Epj ), a careful study of the many reasons for the existence of the "gender pay gap," attributed by ideologues of the identity-politics persuasion to systemic patriarchal prejudice and . They decide to take time out to have and raise children perhaps moving to more flexible work or less demanding jobs.. Other factors include womens tendency for neuroticism their likelihood to experience stress, depression and unpredictability and their high level of agreeableness, to be cooperative and compassionate. https://goo.gl/FX1miP Adam McCulloch is a freelance writer and production editor who has worked in sectors including travel (The Guardian), aviation (Flight International), agriculture (Farmers' Weekly), music (Jazzwise), theatre (The Stage) and social work (Community Care). But it doesnt follow that their career must stall because of it. Just this year, in fact, the National Bureau of Economic Research published a study that showed the gender gap. Peterson often misses the historical context, says Kandola, ignoring the fact that men and women have taken on very different roles in different eras men dominating nursing roles until Florence Nightingale helped to create a profession that was soon considered womens work. window.mc4wp.listeners.push( She had listened recently to an interview of Jordan Peterson, the psychology professor from University of Toronto, who she said casts doubt on gender discrimination as the basis for the. And the relationship is not small. Everyone should read the full Damore memo before believing anyone on the subject. There are going to be more male criminals, and more male engineers, and more females with diagnoses of depression and anxiety, and more female nurses. Is it truly unreasonable, therefore, to point out that the absolute poster boy for such privilege is none other than our Prime Minister, Justin Trudeaua man who dared run for the highest office in the land despite his utter lack of credentials (other than good looks, charm and a certain ability to behave properly in public) merely because his father, Pierre, turned the Trudeau name into the very epitome of status unearned by his sons? I chose to have a 15 year career break, and consider I was fortunate to be in a position to do so. And these differences drive occupational choice, particularly at the extremes. Perhaps (and this is the explanation I favor) its because women have always taken primary care of infants, who are exceptionally vulnerable, and must therefore suffer from hyper-vigilance to threat. The fairly influential paper that established this was by Claudia Goldin and her cleverly titled paper:Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of Blind Auditions on Female Musicians. In it heargues that the gender pay gap is largely a natural reflection of differences between men and women, differences explained in the Big Five personality traits: openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism. And thats why the information that I publicized in Scandinavia caused a scandal that continues to reverberate. All of these traits in your [Damores] manifesto described as female are the core traits that make someone successful at engineering. The correct figure is 1,600. Why is this even a controversy? Something approaching a consensus among psychologists expert in measurement, known as psychometricians (or, less technically, as personality psychologists). Gender pay gap closes by one fifth after reporting introduced Fri 26 Mar 2021 The gender pay gap is closing - this research shows that making employers accountable for their pay gaps can result in significant changes to pay. Engineering is not all about empathy, cooperation, etc. Some projects will be collaborative. Men and women wont sort themselves into the same categories if you leave them to do it of their own accord, he said. And void of objective evidence that those belief systems are coloring my work-related behavior or impacting my organization (in which case there are ample laws allowing for my dismissal and protecting my employer from my behaviors) its not my employers business. Where are the largest differences? Its fair to point out the flaws in the statistics. And that is assuming that the scientist allows for thorough and rigorous disagreement, which helps solidify the conclusions of the science. Sign up now to get the Washington Examiners breaking news and timely commentary delivered right to your inbox. -> She adds that Peterson was selective with the facts He claimed that the meritocracy as described in the Damore memo does not represent a radically conservative path to business success; it is merely a fresh defense of a socially acceptable version of a hostile workplace. on: function(evt, cb) { They have wildly different sexual psychologies that lead to different choices, both in love and in work. Id love to see some research on the matter, instead of Google simply circling the wagons and claim that theres nothing wrong. engineering is all about empathy Seriously? He. Another myth says the gender pay gap is inevitable as women choose lower-paid jobs because of fixed biological traits. Hes being vilified along with Peterson and together they are being held up as the faces of the enemy. Emma Griffin, professor of modern British history at the University of East Anglia, wrote a compelling account of how work was gendered and how these gender distinctions came to be seen as natural. Source: www.youtube.com. Kandola questions Petersons understanding of core issues. // . Closing the pay gap "isn't a threat to men," said Thorsteinn Viglundsson, Icelands former Minister of Social Affairs and Equality. This article was first published on Mavens, an independent publication championing women in advertising. Wherever the debate goes, Petersons is a voice that is being absorbed by a youthful generation online tomorrows employees. Tara Brown wasn't impressed. None of those who commented in the piece regard him as a monster. . The gender pay gap is about comparing the wages of full-time working men and full-time working women, and working out why women earn on average $239.80 less per week than men. The Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson received considerable attention when he visited Stockholm recently. According to Peterson, the population of agreeable people is dominated by women resulting in a fraction of the "gender" pay gap. One of the most popular youtube debates was between matt dillahunty and jordan peterson in 2018. ); Peterson fully endorsed Damores views, interviewing him at length on his YouTube channel. https://goo.gl/mmdShw Women do choose to have children, and many will reduce their hours when they do. As an example he uses his work with law firms in Canada where many of the best performers are women yet the firms are unable to make many of them partners because they so often leave in pursuit of a better work-life balance. But the figures are an important indicator of structural inequality. To begin with, the statistic alone is misleading. } Staff writers } To make important, difficult decisions properly, competence is necessary. Men also choose to have children but the impact on their careers is virtually non-existent. May 23, 2018; Gender Pay Gap Reports: Entrenched segregation and how big bonuses for men create the biggest gender pay gap April 24, 2018; Gender Pay Gaps - further reflection on the BBC pay debacle April 12, 2018 To understand why the pay gap exists we need more data with more detail. Shared parental leave (SPL) was introduced in 2015 but only 3.5% of eligible families chose it in 2018, according to research by telecoms company PowWowNow. Weve already seen that in Scandinavia. Though the two have never sparred in person, they havent be shy about offering an opinion on each others work. Jordan Bernt Peterson (* 12. . The rebellion against HR and the Progressive abuse of diversity targets documented here: http://amzn.to/2FQp6OM. Using Iceland as a model, since just this year pay equality became a legal requirement there (businesses with more than 25 employees must now have government certification to prove their equal-pay policies), "60 Minutes" suggested the rest of us adopt Iceland's new policy. callback: cb Peterson responds by asking why women would want to, adding thatmen are more likely to want to work 70-80 hours a week. Figures also show the gender pay gap often starts long before women have children. A whole bunch of equity industry participants complain that hes too persuasive, throw out stuff like unfairness if ok if it leads to the outcomes we want, and tell companies they need to double-down on their efforts to beat Social Equity opinions into their confused staff. "If you're a social scientist worth your salt, you never do a univariate analysis. We all understand fairness, or think we do, but very few of us understand equality. The only facts in this article are contained in the quotes attributed to Dr. Peterson. I dont believe Peterson would ever claim that there werent, at one point, significant institutional barriers to women participating in the workplace. Thanks for your comment Alexander, interesting stuff. Your involuntary unconscious perceptions have to be retrained., Again, he is careful to ground his scathing criticism in some kind of evidence:People are categorised by novelty aversion. Engineering is all about cooperation, collaboration and empathy for colleagues and customers. As this years data is released, we tackle the most common misconceptions. Member. Given that differences in temperament and interest help determine occupational choice, and that difference in occupational choice drives variability in such things as income, it follows that political doctrines that promote equality of opportunity also drive inequality of outcome. . The results? The selective research Peterson uses happens to be some of the most replicated and robust findings in all of the social science literature. Perhaps its a consequence of womens smaller size, and the danger that poses in conflict. The IAT can reasonably demonstrate some level of difficult to measure implicit bias. So they actually help his case. Many people have criticized VICE for only releasing a 20-minute video when the actual interview was two hours long. Damore wrote in an internal but leaked manifesto: When it comes to diversity and inclusion, Googles left bias has created a politically correct monoculture that maintains its hold by shaming dissenters into silence.. HR practitioners should listen to his arguments and be prepared to defend their corner with the best evidence they can find to support the view that fairer recruitment policies make business sense and benefit us all. I accept that as a result I have less experience than I would have otherwise had, and therefore a lower salary. Just this year, in fact, the National Bureau of Economic Research published a study that showed the gender gap "can be attributed to the dynamic effects of children.". Peterson seems to assume that the status quo will remain the status quo. Equality is a dishonest notion because those who use it do so to deliberately avoid distinguishing between equality of outcome (which is their real objective) and equality of opportunity, which is what normal, sensible reasonable people support.

Kern County Scanner Club, George Walsh Obituary, Roots Pizza Nutrition Information, What Is Buggy Bounty After Timeskip, Articles J